By Pritam: 10
March, 2014,
Definition
Lean
production is a sociotechnical production system with a primary objective of
eliminating waste by concurrently reducing or minimizing supplier, customer and
internal variability. (Verma and Boyer, 2010)
How was it invented?
The
two dominant but fundamentally different approaches to production in the 20thcentury
have been the conversion and flow models respectively. (Koskela, 1992)
Mass
production systems have been considered to focus primarily on the process of
conversion illustrated in the above diagram. The conversion model of production
breaks the manufacturing process down to a series of activities, each of which
converts an input to an output. This can be seen in the diagram below. This
model uses the batch and queue theory. (Womack, 1996)
The
theory states that for machines to achieve a high utilization rate they must be
run continually. Parts are hence manufactured in large batches at one process
within a plant and then queued for the next process. This results in large
inventories from high work-in-progress levels (WIP), bottlenecking and other
manufacturing problems.
(Diekmann, et.al., 2004)
The
above diagram represents a generalized flow model of production. The idea of
production as a flow process is central to lean production. The flow process
does not view the production stream only as a group of conversions, but as a
mixture of value adding and non-value adding activities. (Koskela, 1992)
(Diekmann, et al., 2004)
The
concept of lean production has its roots in the assembly line manufacturing
methodology developed by Toyota for efficient automobile manufacturing, known
as the Toyota Production System (TPS). The idea of producing only required
units, at the time needed and in the needed quantities, to eliminate
unnecessary and intermediate and finished product inventories is central to the
Toyota Production System.
(Verma
and Boyer, 2010)
As
an aftermath of the Second World War, businesses like the Toyota Motor Company
(established in 1937) were facing material shortages coupled with small
production volumes. This enforced the need to raise the levels of productivity
to those found in large volume production, but with utilizing materials
efficiently to produce only the required amount of products.
(Toyota
Global, 2014)
The
company hence adopted an improvised version of the Ford Production System
developed by Henry Ford during the early part of the twentieth century. Some
scholars still credit Henry Ford for founding the original principles of lean
thinking in doing so. One of Toyota’s lead engineers, Taiichi Ohno had studied
the Ford Production System in America. Ohno studied and mastered the system and
was tasked with conceptualizing the Ford Production System in a Japanese
context. Ohno introduced new, additional principles and approaches to further
enhance the effectiveness of the Ford Production System.
(Verma
and Boyer, 2010)
The
aim of lean production is combining the quality and flexibility offered by
craftsmanship with the low cost advantages of mass production. Lean production
is regarded as the third step in a historical progression in industry that
began with the age of craftsmanship, followed by the methods of mass production
to an era that combines the best of both worlds. (The Economist, 2009)
Lean Thinking
Lean
production as a concept was originally developed for manufacturing automobiles.
The same principles and techniques however, can be applied to companies that
operate in other industries. It is argued that lean thinking is more than a set
of techniques and approaches but rather a mindset for all employees and
managers with waste elimination and variability reduction in all business
processes being the main focus.
(Verma
and Boyer, 2010, p 449)
Womack,
Jones and Roos (1991) describe the five core components of a lean production
system as follows:
Lean Principal 1: The value in a lean production system should
be defined from the customer’s point of view for each product family.
Lean Principal 2: Each production step should be evaluated in
terms of its contribution to value creation. Those actions that do not add
value should be eliminated.
Lean Principal 3: the value creating sequence of steps should be
organized in a tight and integrated sequence to develop smooth flow toward the
customer.
Lean Principal 4: Instead of organizing production to push
finished products to the customers, products pulled by the customers should be
the driver for planning, organizing, and scheduling upstream production
activities.
Lean Principal 5: All members of the organization should pursue
perfection through continuous improvement.
(Verma
and Boyer, 2010, p 450)
In
the above diagram Shah and Ward (2007) state a lean production system to be
comprised of three constructs related to customers, suppliers and internal
processes. Each individual construct relies on different underlying concepts. A
just-in-time inventory management system, customer involvement, different
aspects of production processes are some examples of these concepts.
(Verma
and Boyer, 2010)
Waste elimination in Lean Production
The
idea of value from a customer’s point of view is central to lean thinking.
Customers will refuse paying for a product or service that fails to offer
value.
In
a lean thinking framework, all production activities are carefully evaluated,
ensuring that the customer finds the finished product or service valuable. This
enforces the need of eliminating or minimizing all non-value added activities.
The types of waste in a production system can be broadly categorized as follows:
Muda: A Japanese term for production activities that are
wasteful and do not add value to the goods or services.
Mura: Waste associated with the unevenness of the processes.
Muri: Waste resulting from overburden or unreasonableness.
The
three general types of wastes namely muda, mura and muri are found in different
forms within manufacturing and service systems. The above diagram provides a
breakdown of the different forms of waste in system that contribute in
overproduction, loss of time, lengthy production processes, increased waste as
a result of large inventories and so on. Reducing the impact of different forms
of waste shown above requires careful systems thinking, long-term commitment to
continuous improvement and the co-operation of all members of the organization
to identify wastes, troubleshoot and formulating approaches that lead to reduce
all wastes.
Find so much information. really helpful article ...hopping to see next post ..
ReplyDelete